Andy Gocke

> this makes the number of subtypes part of the public contract I don't think this is really true, because it's a broader language design opinion at the level of...

@YairHalberstadt I see, so you're talking about the broader, design-level question. As to the question of whether this would count as an "explicit" opt-in to the behavior, I would guess...

FYI @jaredpar @MadsTorgersen, this is my attempt at defining lifetimes as a type system feature, and then reducing the proposed rules to it. Not many problems for the most part,...

One thing I want to clarify: I don't really take any position on whether we want this syntax in the language itself. Mainly I think having the syntactical representation (and...

I've been looking at this for a bit -- I think the best way to support this might be a custom test host process. Main problem right now seems to...

Never mind, I misunderstood the docs here. I thought "host" meant a custom exe that could run tests -- instead it looks like it means a dotnet core host. I...

Happy to help out if necessary. Also, I think the biggest advantage is not just in testing for `dotnet/runtime` -- the new version of xunit, 3.0, doesn't support DLL-based tests...

@nohwnd Could you point me to docs on how you would write your own host? In the code above, it looks like the vstest code exits if `testhost.dll` doesn't exist.

If the network protocol is well defined, I don't mind using that to connect to vstest. It would be nice if there were a reusable library i could reference for...

@nohwnd This is dogfood blocking -- could we prioritize looking into it?