Andy Gocke
Andy Gocke
@dsyme Very cool. Yup, FSharp.Data looks like it should work just fine with trimming.
I independently thought of the same thing when @chsienki and I were brainstorming a while ago. Seems useful. I assumed that non-void return types would require an implementation method.
This does seem really annoying. I'm not sure I have a language proposal that would fix this, but it would be something I'd like to address. The obvious route would...
Not quite following how the other issue subsumes this one -- is it purely because the proposed syntactic alterations include `namespace-or-type-name` on the RHS?
I will be moving my proposal of "closed" type hierarchies from Roslyn to this repo shortly. I also think we should explore "real" discriminated unions and have some thoughts on...
I just hit this as well. Seems like a simple, worthwhile feature. It basically means I can provide my users the following API: ```C# public class C { public void...
> This is something that has to be thought through and considered. This is why I reject the idea that it's a simple feature to implement. Agreed, I forgot about...
Same idea, but also recognizing an existing pattern
> Does this still need a null check? Imagine it's prefixed with `#nullable enable` and no, that doesn't, because `c` is not nullable.
> Though on the fence if i think this special case is worth having support for A different way of looking about it: this is a bug fix. It is...