Anthony Gitter

#837 is an example issue for a website that (at the time) did not have an associated paper. However, I don't see a major need to define a standard issue...

Thanks for the suggestions. Would you like to write a short update to this section? Discussing bias in data sets and evaluations is definitely of interest to us. I could...

cc @gwaygenomics who summarized #213

Paragraph and section header highlighting would be a great start. That would primarily be a deep review-specific feature that would be useful to show what parts of the manuscript have...

I like the idea. It would help us objectively assess what has changed in the domain since v1, adding to our own subjective takes. The @greenelab has tools and data...

Thanks for the contribution @pierremac. I edited the original post to use the DOI link https://doi.org/10.1101/262501, which makes it easier for us to add citations with Manubot.

@marcofavorito that's a different workflow than what many Manubot users have set up, but it is a logical approach. Manubot doesn't support it directly, but it should be possible to...

Thanks @jaybee84! There is another related idea that may be a good starting point. This one is a customized Manubot manuscript that deploys manuscript builds from pull requests https://github.com/manubot/rootstock/issues/351 The...

@marcofavorito if you want to try any of these ideas and your manuscript repository is public, we can inspect the workflow to help debug any problems that arise.

This does make sense, and we have one example you may be able to use as a template. The [COVID-19 review](https://github.com/greenelab/covid19-review) is a Manubot manuscript that combines 8 separate manuscripts....