Anthony Gitter

@swamidass yes, there are some updates underway. We've backed off calling it a 2020 update because there is not a fixed timeline. Instead we're referring to the updated version generically...

@delton137 thanks for continuing this pull request. It looks like you were able to work with the `delton137-interpret` branch successfully. I checked the AppVeyor HTML preview, and all of your...

> We should probably be talking more about what we do after v1.0 Agreed. I think we should only take pull requests on obvious typos until v1.0.

@stephenra we used milestones within GitHub and labels (usually, not always) for some form of organization. We also ended up having a few master issues to track progress and link...

@stephenra I'd say the number of maintainers depends on what exactly we want to sustain. Is it an up-to-date manuscript or book? A curated list of papers, tools, and data?...

@stephenra This is actually a good time to have the conversation while we still have contributors' attention after the recent round of revisions. Let us know if you have more...

I agree that it is important to think about authorship, how new contributors will be recognized and incentivized, and what will happen to the existing contributors in a `v2.0` release....

@manolik this is great, thanks for the suggestions. I see many benefits to a major reorganization: - We can create a more logical organization around the content rather than the...

Cross-referencing the scVI preprint #682 that we cited. This whole paragraph in the review could use updating, there has been a lot new work in the area: > Neural networks...

Thanks for all these paper updates @akma327. Can you please provide the DOI URL for manuscripts instead of the journal URL? That makes it easier for us to add them...