Anthony Gitter

@sacdallago it looks like these edits already went through one round of review and almost everything has been addressed. It there only one point of discussion to resolve before this...

@j3xugit I believe this comment above (https://github.com/greenelab/deep-review/pull/1003#discussion_r408240094) may be waiting for your feedback. @sacdallago proposed a change to line 321 to see if you agree with that rephrasing.

@sacdallago updating the protein secondary and tertiary structure section sounds great to me. We will want to line up a reviewer with domain expertise because I only have general knowledge...

Thanks for cataloging and sharing these @aky. Before you or anyone else draft new text on this topic, I recommend finding potential pull request reviewers here. Now that the project...

We used to automate some of the funding section (#550). I would no longer recommend that approach. It grouped grants by funder, then sorted within a funder, then listed authors...

Thanks for the suggestion @AnneCarpenter ! I haven't tried adding `--table-of-contents` to the PDF build like @dhimmel suggested, but the current PDF does show bookmarks correctly as an alternative overview:...

Thanks for the suggestions @birajaghoshal. I'm adding the abstract and DOI link for this paper as well: > Multi-label classification in deep learning is a practical yet challenging task, because...

@123helloworld123 this repository focuses on a review manuscript and discussion of deep learning in biomedicine. None of us are affiliated with the manuscript linked above, so you'll have to try...

@AiHrt @FoadJafari please see my comment above: > this repository focuses on a review manuscript and discussion of deep learning in biomedicine. None of us are affiliated with the manuscript...

Good idea. Should we also add a footnote before the affiliations in the manuscript noting additional authors with a link here?