Matthias Pohl

I agree with you. I had this discussion with @zentol recently as well. Ideally, we should move the Docker image into a Apache-owned repo and push to a public Docker...

fyi: I won't be responsive till the end of April at least

Thanks for your help @HuangXingBo and @morazow for your persistence. :-) Code-wise, I'm fine after @HuangXingBo approved the functionality. 👍 @morazow can we get a final test run of the...

Thanks for the contribution, @morazow . I removed the extra commit and will go ahead with merging the PR. I guess we don't need to create backports for this kind...

fyi: I will be off for the rest of April and, therefore, wouldn't be able to finalize this PR. You might want to reach out to other committers or expect...

CI test failure is unrelated: FLINK-34513

@flinkbot run azure

I'm not gonna wait for another CI round. Looks like the CI bot didn't pick up the rerun command. Anyway, I verified that the test ran (see [logs](https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=59935&view=logs&j=af184cdd-c6d8-5084-0b69-7e9c67b35f7a&t=0f3adb59-eefa-51c6-2858-3654d9e0749d&l=14026)).

One final thing: I wasn't able to do it myself somehow. Can you change the commit message prefix from `[refactor]` to `[FLINK-20398]`? "refactor" isn't a prefix the Flink community usually...

Yeah, the test failure is unrelated (FLINK-35042). Unfortunately, we missed to get it in before the feature freeze. Let's merge it after the release branch for 1.20 is created.