Matthias Pohl
Matthias Pohl
Sure. Could you provide backport PRs for 1.18 and 1.17? Then I can merge all the necessary PRs at once.
I created FLINK-34038 to cover [the test failure](https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/98463496-1af2-4620-8eab-a2ecc1a2e6fe/_build/results?buildId=56110). It's unrelated to this change.
I rebased the change onto master after the preceeding PR of FLINK-34047 was merged to master
Fair enough. What about squashing the FLINK-33565-related commits into a single one?
ok, fine with me :+1:
> (Could also move the debug_files_utils script out of the azure-pipelines directory but š ) I rather leave everything in one place for now and move it to a better...
Theoretically, we might want to link FLINK-27885 with FLINK-29541. I guess, mentioning in FLINK-29541 that files in other modules need to be migrated as well is sufficient enough. :thinking:
On another note: We should rebase the branch to include FLINK-31962 which would make CI succeed again.
> I think about it, the change of parallelism already exists in the existing unit test, I think we don't need to add the test, because it already includes the...
Hi @xuzhiwen1255 , sorry for making you wait for so long. I was on vacation and have to focus on some other work right now. I try to get back...