Urgau
Urgau
> You forgot several lines: Sure, but they also need to be included with all the other proposal I think, so using `include!` doesn't change this.
I still see *(some)* of those lines in the current `minicore-smoke-test.rs` file with `//@ use-minicore` (which compiles `minicore` as a separate crate): https://github.com/jieyouxu/rust/blob/90b6aae363cd7418ead533102204814808093e22/tests/codegen/compiletest-self-test/minicore-smoke-test.rs#L8-L11 (but there would probably be fewer of...
@rustbot transfer leadership-council
The future incompatibility warning was merged in #14671. I tried adding an unstable Cargo feature but that would I mean either making not insignificant refactor to the parsing or evaluation,...
> * Do we have any discussion of “enough time” elsewhere like on Zulip? Not that I'm aware. > * Should we wait for stabilization of [Tracking issue for RFC...
We are currently having a T-lang FCP of the feature in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138632 (with 5/5 check-boxes). I'm expecting it to land in 1.88 (it branches at the end of this week),...
RFC3695 has now passed it's T-lang stabilization final comment period over at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138632#issuecomment-2788152230
From my side yes, I don't know if you also want to do an FCP or if you consider the T-lang FCP to be enough, but either way the changes...
False positive `unfulfilled_lint_expectations` for `enum_glob_use` with `--all-targets` or `--tests`
The lint emission is gated behind the compilation unit NOT behind a test harness generation, it shouldn't be. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/fb9913ef3be6af354de0e0725d7f82a075d94b89/clippy_lints/src/wildcard_imports.rs#L119-L121
We discussed this pull request during @rust-lang/internal-sites triage of non-RFC PRs in [#t-internal-sites > Stale non-RFC PRs @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/538071-t-internal-sites/topic/Stale.20non-RFC.20PRs/near/546011978). We consider that adding the proposed sentence to the README is...