Tracer

> Could you guys please allow mta downgrade > to r22771, so we retest precisely latest versions with my most problematic users, to locate the issue? > Did you try...

Where does the lua_next get called here? Whats the stack trace?

> Doubtful, because of linux it compiled fine on linux, what are you on about?

> > > Doubtful, because of linux > > > > > > it compiled fine on linux, what are you on about? > > It is possible that problems...

> > If it compiles fine on x86_64-gcc-10 and arm-gcc-10 then it should compile for other modern compilers > > It doesn't work like this I know, but if it...

> > I know, but if it matches the standard then it should work on most compilers that conform to the C++ standard. > > There arent any major runtime...

> You forgot about real-time bugs As I said before, the only real implication would be the change from `__attribute__((unused))` to `[[maybe_unused]]`. Every other change is just an explicit SString...

> Hello! Is there a problem with the support of other C++20 server modules? With some, probably. But I didnt check. Lets just get C++20 support for the deathmatch first

Im not interested in advancing this PR further anymore. If someone wants to refresh it, feel free to do so.

> Did you forget to push your changes? Indeed, gonna push it in a sec