Torkel Loman

Agreed that we at some point we have to think of moving stuff over to MT, been holding it off for quite a while waiting for MT to get more...

One thing we could potentially do, unless we find something which covers all cases, is to allow for different macros, e.g. ```julia rn = @sometag_reaction_network (k1,k2), X1 X2 end ```...

```julia rn = @reaction_network begin k*B, 3*A --> 2*C end k ``` this would work, but `B` would be considered a species. A default behaviour could become problematic in a...

Declaring with species instead of parameters would work. But there's still teh question what woudl actually be the most useful default (i.e. do more people prefer declaring the paraemter order...

Maybe the following "beginner" tutorials: - Introduction to using Catalyst (similar to what we have now). - Simulating Catalyst models using DifferentialEquations.jl (basically an intro guide to DiffEq simulations and...

I think in that case, it might be better to just split it, and have a separate "Catalyst & Julia for Julia beginners" tutorial, possibly in several sections. And then...

If I understand right, this would allow having each reaction, instead of adding a fixed number of reactants, the number which is generated would be a stochastic variable? Generalising stoichiometries...

Allowing as general things in `ReactionSystem`s seems sensible. As long as it doesn't affect the performance of the solvers it should be fine. The case of ODE/SDEs shouldn't really be...

Never thought about delays in Jumps. Yes, it may take some time until this might actually come to use.

Would it be possible, at least for standard cases, to autogenerate units for parameters? Even in the Gillespie case, the units should just be copy numbers for each species, right?...