Torkel Loman

Results 439 comments of Torkel Loman

> `System` seems to just accept `X(t-\tau)` directly, so maybe we can just let people type that (and add a check to see if there are delayed variables / capture...

No, you are right, I mixed it up!

Yes, your approach seems like the way to go

Something liek this? ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18099310/213553351-a09859cf-dde1-4c8e-9339-fbef3d8e2ad4.png)

We could do something like this. Is there some expert in the Julai community who does these kinds of things? Alternatively, I could spend some more time making a better...

Also, an alternative version (literally depicting a catalysis reaction) ![image](https://github.com/SciML/Catalyst.jl/assets/18099310/06c2c9a7-545d-4a95-bdeb-bfd1b1012bc6)

Given the `@parameters` option, one can do: ```julia using Catalyst rn = @reaction_network begin @parameters Y [isconstantspecies=true] k, X + Y --> 0 end ``` It seems like a sensible...

sounds good. When I add the `@variables` macro option (probably this week) I will also add some tests to ensure that this works.

With ModelingToolkit you have some decent flexibility with regards to this now. What do you think @isaacsas ?

I think this proposed notation would compete with the proposed notation for adding metadata/options to reactions, e.g. ```julia @reaction_network begin d, X --> 0, [noise_scaling_parameter=ns] end ``` It would still...