Torkel Loman
Torkel Loman
I have sent an updated project folder
Thanks, that did work. However, the runtimes suffer quite bad. E.g. for `LD_MMA` computing the example interval takes 12 seconds (and only about 200ms for `LN_NELDERMEAD`). E.g. `LD_LBFGS` is not...
I should not that even for `scan_tol = 1e-6`, `LN_NELDERMEAD` finishes in ~400 ms (so still faster than the gradient-based methods).
A final note (sorry for all the comments). When I run using a gradient-based method, also supplying a gradient, I get lots of ```julia ┌ Warning: autodiff gradient is not...
The warning are from a large scan of auto-generated data sets on a hpc, so it is non-trivial to create a reproducing MWE. I will have a go through, and...
Got it. Yes, I think that if we could simply pass SciML's `OptimizationFunction` (or `OptimizationProblem`) into `get_interval` that would be very useful. E.g. stuff like `theta_bounds` is already defined there,...
Makes sense. Is this recorded somewhere in the output solution (i.e. is it possible to check that this have happened)?
Sounds good. Yeah, some kind of record would be useful (although admittedly my application is also a bit niche). Feel free to closet his if you want :+1:
I was going to keep it for now, but then I had incompatibilities with other SciML stuff that I couldn't sort out, and since it was due for an exit...