Torkel Loman
Torkel Loman
(since this is mostly a ModelingToolkit issue, I have opened an issue there as well: https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl/issues/2293)
I agree that there are two types of distributions here. For the stoichiometric coefficients, these should remain distributions. Parameters in rate, they should be drawn at the beginning.
Documentation seems busted. Might have to do with recent Julia updates or Documenter updates, see https://github.com/korsbo/Latexify.jl/pull/278 which provides very minimal changes.
Ideally, if possible, this one should be merged: https://github.com/korsbo/Latexify.jl/pull/277, as it is more extensive (but contain the same changes.
The policy is to never mutate these directly though, and always provide functions for this. Not that there is anything that can be done to stop people, but in principle,...
> Well, see the Slack you were just posting on. I mean, I obviously saw it, that is how I got here. But it still feels like an obscure case....
Sorry, I should have shut up.
So, I agree that having hybrid simulations being the default should be the norm and possible (and have a good interface). I still think for tracking people about CRNs it...
I can confirm that this is an issue coming from MTK, I have raised it there as well and will push for them sorting it out asap.
Sounds good, yes, feel free to make a separate issue as well. Right now there are a couple of bugs related to `remake` circulating within MTK (but I expect these...