Matt Corallo
Matt Corallo
> It might be useful to posit this amendment idea to the mailing list in order to get more input on the forward direction. Done
> I don't like adding proposed new features to a final BIP, i.e. defining new keys that haven't be used in practice (like sp). The point of the proposed change...
Thinking on this more, I think a policy of "we can update a final BIP to describe what is actually happening in practice but not to give forward guidance on...
Right, I believe my above claim is that there isn't any (more) difference of opinion :). Still, more generally I'm not at all convinced that "access to a document" is...
> That said, I think describing reality, especially if it's made clear that it differs from the original specification, is very advantageous to later implementers and those attempting to understand...
> the ideal of not giving anyone unnecessarily privileged access to the specification process I'll be honest, I'd never considered that an ideal of the BIP process, including the reason...
Okay, updated this PR to instead add a new BIP.
Yep, that's right, I've added some examples.
BOLT 12 invoice_requests are not intended to be published. What you're looking for are BOLT 12 refunds. You are right that this could include refunds explicitly, however there's no reason...
Ugh, can we split this? 42 commits in one PR is just a lot...