Stephen Hodgson

You are setting a custom config per platform, on the data provider level. The top down approach means that each master configuration can me wildly different than the per platform...

I suppose it's simpler in the fact that you can easily see the changes, but it's more complex because of the vast differences you can have form one master configuration...

Imho, it' simply a UX problem. But in reality we really need it to be this way from a arch standpoint. We can easily make a window that shows just...

> Putting the global (shared) config in one folder. Then creating platform variances only where I needed them That's already the way it works

Core system service profiles are the global shared config, and the data provider profiles are the per platform settings. We just need a way to make this easier to access...

And make it more obvious that the data provider settings take precedent (even tho it may be the same options on the system level.

TL;DR I don't wanna change the way the whole xrtk fundamentally works, when it's just a UX problem.

I just wanted to keep it clean by opening a new issue as an alt. Linked back here, just in case. Is that okay?

Most likely the Singleton definition has an ambiguous reference to a Singleton class in the editor XR namespace.

> In xcode, scheme, you can see UnityFramework.framework, then click Run/Build I'm not seeing this either