Adrian Edwards

> May we assume you ran this locally and collected data? Lets not assume - would rather accidentally over-test than not test at all.

no, the exception is getting thrown as intended, im just filing this as a note because i (or someone else) should probably check that it is being caught and handled,...

best case i just need to change the specific celery exception that im converting this one to when it hits the celery layer of the stack (i.e. tell it to...

ResourceGoneException is one that I created/named myself within augur, so it should be easy to search the codebase for and see how it is used (its really quite simple)

> ResourceGoneException is one that I created/named myself within augur, so it should be easy to search the codebase for and see how it is used (its really quite simple)...

This change is going to require more than just a schema change. We discussed it briefly at the end of today's Augur call and Sean mentioned that this is likely...

> We probably should discuss this one and decide how it intersects with the other db updates you've been working on. This is a pretty major fix, possibly a breaking...

Closing this PR as I dont see it getting merged anytime soon due to the aforementioned complexities surrounding handling peoples existing data from Augur instances of various ages

[this](https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/discussions/13627) discussion on rabbits repo seems to suggest that something about the application code may be preventing rabbit heartbeats for 2 minutes and causing this. unsure if that applies here...

this google groups thread seems to also start drilling down into the "broker forced connection closure" part: https://groups.google.com/g/rabbitmq-users/c/a_zJuidbHic?pli=1