Adrian Edwards
Adrian Edwards
the only challenge I see with this is how the migration will work. To do the migration without data loss would require at least making a copy of half of...
I think a phased approach like that would probably end up being a little bit worse, because you'd still have the problem of temporarily raising how much data is needed...
yeah I agree. @JohnStrunk may have more context on why recursive chmod was chosen here. I suspect it may be to handle cases where existing facade directories, potentially with ownership...
related to #3212
same applies here https://github.com/chaoss/augur/blob/2c9a5f1f2a9b58cfec035982fd0b27bd31cb0fbe/augur/tasks/util/collection_util.py#L605 lists of tasks, such as can be seen in facade_phase (variable `facade_core_collection`)
on my local test instance (which ive never done an explicit vacuum on, just letting autovacuum happen): `pull_request_reviews` (83%), `commit_messages` (65%), `contributors` (59%) (just for those three, which again seem...
we think this is another symptom of the DB contention on these same tables that may be causing some of the facade issues as well
> * Create a comprehensive Dockerfile that follows best practices for non-root user execution. > > * Add a docker-compose.yml for easier container orchestration. Please make sure you understand the...
Ah yes i see what you are saying. The issue here is that there should be the option to pass the DB connection parameters into the augur backend image. This...
Related issue in the ocp config repo: https://github.com/oss-aspen/augur-on-ocp/issues/6