Martin
Martin
The current behavior is in line with the F# spec. `do` is part of the `while` context and therefore needs to be indented like anything else. (The same is true...
Nice work. But this is not a fix, but a new feature that needs an RFC. (Which should also document the effect on tooling (where it is / can be...
> How is the RFC process working? Do I have to make it, or someone else? It is typically created by somebody interested in the feature. The process is described...
EDIT: moved to [discussion](https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-design/discussions/819#discussioncomment-14348438)
Can a section "Changes to the F# spec" be added?
I typically had more changes in FCS than in the tests, so the total wait time for ComponentTests builds was negligible compared to FCS builds.
> Had another thought about it, and I am not sure if a function is strictly superior - it would limit the placement of `warning ".."` as opposed to using...
> Just to add a bit from the tooling and language design perspective. F# is indentation sensitive, and there are many cases where allowing something to be less indented makes...
> "Has to" is a bit of an assumption. The parser mostly supports three styles until it doesn't. As far as I know, Stroustrup style has been valid F# since...
It says "[an offside line is introduced at ...] The column of the first token of a (, { or begin token." So, it does not matter if that first...