Manish Goregaokar
Manish Goregaokar
@sffc you're the most up to date on ECMA402 coverage: do you know if we have issues for most of these? Are any of these unexpected (they seem to be...
RGSA, which is is also missing in ICU but ICU lies about it
I roughly agree with Robert's stance with the caveat that I'm not a huge fan of having inherent methods named the same as trait methods that are implemented by the...
> @Manishearth If you hold this position, should we reconsider #4590? It's a very weakly held position, I think #4590 is okay. I'm also fine with the proposal here for...
@robertbastian How much of this is done? Does this just need a final audit, or are there pieces that still need doing?
@robertbastian is that the only case? I'd say we can close this issue then.
Assuming https://github.com/unicode-org/icu4x/pull/6103, I think we can close this out once that lands.
That landed, nothing left is in stable code.
For UnstableSealed traits we should mark UnstableSealed and the methods of UnstableSealed traits (but not the assoc types) as `cfg(not(feature = unstable), doc(hidden))`
Assigning to @sffc since it's a part of the whole set of datetime changes