Manish Goregaokar

Oh, I see, the algorithm needs specific hash functions too. I guess a more specific trait (more specific than `Hasher`) implemented on these would work?

I've posted https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-unify-dashes-and-underscores-on-crates-io/13216/13. It's becoming more clear to me that this doesn't _need_ an RFC, but I've posted the pre RFC anyway. I don't actually think the exponential growth for...

Oh that's a clever idea. I'm in favor though don't have time to implement it myself.

> This is further complicated by cargo unifying the features in build/dev/proc-macro dependencies. Note that this is fixed with the new resolver. ------ Would it still be possible to do...

> I assume the worst that can happen if an OS doesn't support it is that you get an error when you try to use it Could also hit a...

cc @maurer @durin42 Yes, I'm worried about this producing bad values that get passed down to libc.

Yes please, it would be good if the defaults were safe and the deviations from the defaults were strongly documented, linking to these man pages.

Can we have these assertions not fail outside of ranges where we expect the calendar to be well-behaved?

Manish to file Temporal issue.

I think that's unlikely but it's possible that there's an efficient way to represent their overlap.