Lucio Franco
Lucio Franco
I am going to remove this from 0.7 because it will be quite challenging to get this change in right now and I would actually like to refactor the `transport`...
Thanks for running these benches! I've been meaning to write some but it doesn't make to much sense right now because we are waiting on a new release of `prost`...
Great! I'd also be very happy to work on this with you, expanding benchmarks and improving stuff is very much welcome here and I do plan on doing a bunch...
hmmmm this seems like it is a bug with `tonic-web` maybe?
It should be possible to write an example for this I think
Would it be possible to reproduce the server side in rust rather than scala? I don't have much experience reading scala. Another thing you can look at too is if...
@arjunyel this seems interesting, I'm not sure what their definition of the "quality bar" is so it may make sense to open an issue in the main grpc repo about...
Sorry for the delayed response on this! Is there a spec for gRPC over WS? Beyond gRPC web?
Yeah, lets put this on hold to get into tonic, but I want to circle back once I write the new transport and maybe we can get things to fit...
Potentially, I plan to basically extract all the transport stuff so the tonic crate is just a grpc impl. That should make it much easier to get WASM things working...