Lucio Franco
Lucio Franco
Sorry for the delay on this, I think this is a great idea but I want to refactor some of the transport so will consider this in the new version.
Are you sure this error is coming from tonic? I don't see anywhere where we might have created this error message?
Two main things that are somewhat blockers for this: - Getting support for this within `prost` and exposed generically within tonic. - Finding a way to get this support for...
I believe the first step is to add support for this in prost. I want to say https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost/issues/301 this is the closet issue to what you may want.
@johanbrandhorst Hi! This is definitely something I would like to support. So the goal of the `transport` module is actually to be the "HTTP/2" implementation. In fact, this transport is...
@johanbrandhorst yeah that would be nice. The biggest issue is just having to map http 2 bodies to http 1 bodies. Even though they are the same type I believe...
Yeah, so dealing with the body stream we will need to consume the whole body before we can send it I believe. So that part will be a bit complex....
Also, I'd like to build a `grpc-web` proxy but written in rust :)
@pkinsky @johanbrandhorst thank you both! I'm not sure exactly what the best path forward might be but I think the first goal would be to build a HTTP/1.1 transport and...
@johanbrandhorst sounds great! Looking forward to see what turns out of it! :)