Tomasz Chabora
Tomasz Chabora
Still valid in 3.2.3 You can use containers to avoid this issue.
> Use Vector instead of List internally for connections (this also removes unreadable list element access, e.g. E->get()->...) You can get rid of `E->get()` in list too, List supports the...
Editing connections in the inspector is quite buggy. I think the property should either be hidden or readonly (with a note in the docs).
Another thing is that there is no way to link to a constructor, like to methods and members.
Yeah I noticed the constructors have `name` field, but each one is named the same. Hence it's effectively not possible to utilize it in a useful way.
C# already have this. At least for standard (non-Godot) collections.
> What's the proper way to rewrite that piece of code if editing arrays in loops is forbidden? I use this code: ```gdscript var invalid_objects := [] for id in...
Still valid in db5ea78b7
> another solution that requires less user interaction But this solution requires 0 user interaction. The flag would be set automatically (unless maybe disabled). > Wouldn't really help plugins, as...
> And for the rest of us you need to mark every connection as NO_EDITOR in code. Well, with code connections you don't usually run in such problems. And you...