Frotty

> when only change a wurst package. not need compile all package. It's not that easy. What you're asking for is incremental compilation. Would be nice but usually causes more...

any update on this @Cokemonkey11

We have reservations about adding broad spectrum fileIO, but something like this would be nice.

I think it would be nice if we could setup a test suite of some wurst resources (stdlib, fdef. ebr. itt) and then let jenkins compile it with master and...

should display sum after the value so we can see where the times differ. Typecheck seems to take 1000ms longer almost e.g. I will run this also and post results....

I think the JVM would need to be warmed up and have enough heap to not cause any garbage collection during build to produce useful results. Right now without opimizations...

We thought about that some time ago. While I think [] might have _some_ purposes, the () example only makes the code less readable and harder to understand. (a lot...

Yup, not supported rn.

Could be a useful addition for libraries - though I don't think there hardly ever is a real "need" to forbid overriding in Wurst, due to the lack of low...

> It has nothing to do with constants / final variables. I didn't mean to imply that. I was simply referring to `constant native` "functions" from the `common.j`.