Jeremiah Senkpiel
Jeremiah Senkpiel
just saw this, might get to it in a week or two! putting it on a better tracker for myself
Ok so unfortunately this ended way back on my list fo things to do, but here's a summary of some differences (in no particular order) (to my knowledge). Just to...
A brief update: `start` is required on "end" sinks since b5032d4540d681bbf315d53c38b11c67b780a702, and is no longer an extension.
Ok so I just had a wild thought... what if, instead of having multiple pulls, implementations requiring this just use multiple streams? Maybe this isn't easy if there's no limit...
Should receiving additional `pull()` and/or `next()`s from components which an error has not yet bubbled to... matter? i.e. component has errored, error passed along, but data is still flowing around...
So I've had returning thoughts to this, mostly from two places: ---- 1. @mcollina's [request for multi-buffer support](https://github.com/Fishrock123/bob/pull/35#discussion_r294015269) I can't really think of a pleasant way to fit MB support...
Right, that file is a reference. The source would have to implement it itself.
why is this enabled
My latest thought from [this twitter thread](https://twitter.com/Fishrock123/status/1172257626131959820) was `move()` but I think `give()` is probably better.
@Raynos You mean to note where that particular read was done from?