Jacob Finkelman

So many deadlines have passed me by, I like the sound they make when they go past, it makes me hesitant to admit to anymore. But according to the document...

> Would you be open to the change being ported to the v0.2 branch? Yes. We would need to be careful about breaking changes related to `strictly_lower_than(5) == lower_than(4)`. The...

Most of what I'm about to say you already know, but I'm talking it out to clarify my own thoughts. I would love to provide better APIs for querying the...

I think adding something to PartialSolution like: ```rust /// Retrieve intersection of terms related to package that will not chage. // It is pub for UV pub fn unchanging_term_intersection_for_package( &self,...

What is the plan for other "patch like" changes to a crate version? For example editing the "description" or "maintenance"? I only ask because the same argument would suggest that...

This is a really good idea. If adopting this new crate is not a braking change, we could even release a version of 0.2 that uses it solving #258. Also...

Looks like we have a plan! Thanks for the work here!

In the long run, I'd like to see https://github.com/pubgrub-rs/pubgrub/pull/163 but for `unavailable` constraints. This should probably happen after upstreaming the ability to customize the error message for each constraint. Which...

Most of the existing fields are in fact optional, to handle index entries that meet the description provided by some old version of cargo. (Or more generally, for registries that...

How does this proposal interact with the two excepted RFCs ([RFC 3139](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10474) and [RFC 3231](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10519)) related to securing registries? Why is secret material stored in `config.toml` and not in `credentials.toml`?...