Dan Albert
Dan Albert
Not enough information. What sample are you talking about?
Sorry for the delayed response. There wasn't anyone able to look after the repo for a while. I'm focused mostly on improving what's already here rather than adding new samples...
We always update LLVM as part of our regular release cycle, FWIW. You don't need to file bugs for that.
It's not something we currently have planned. We need to take another look at how the various modules implementations finally settled and see if this is something worth doing now.
I don't think it would help you. From that bug: > /data/data/com.termux/files/usr/include/bits/pthread_types.h:104:14: note: declaration here is not visible. Why isn't it visible? Who knows. Because it's a private header. If...
We're still talking about the non-standard variant of C++ modules, right? afaict moduelmaps aren't a part of the thing that was standardized. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/modules does not use the word "map" once,...
No, that's exactly why we haven't done anything about this yet. The ecosystem is fragmented and we're waiting for it to settle before going down what may be the wrong...
That's our plan for now. We used to say that on our roadmap, but we added that ten years ago and nothing's improved, so it was removed. We're well aware...
> so if you want to wait for standards finalization Mild pedantry: modules _have_ been standardized, just not this kind. The kind described on the cppreference page above is the...
@eugenis should we be pursuing this?