Dan Albert
Dan Albert
> of course when people started shipping native code they kept shipping the oldest one you'd support even when that's not most efficient. This proposal would add another bytecode layer...
Ideas, sure, run your benchmarks. You're very, very early though. We're only recently getting close to having enough of the initial steps done to be _able_ to run any interesting...
That performance analysis (and any other you'll find that wasn't done by us) is probably comparing _sandboxed_ wasm performance to native. We expect that to be far slower, and that's...
https://github.com/DanAlbert/sccache-example, but it's incomplete for the reasons mentioned in the readme.
> re: building sccache via cargo install, that is definitely not recommended! Oh yes, I saw the warnings in your docs (thanks for documenting that!) Above I was just trying...
I may have filed this before we realized that LLD supported the API 23 stuff natively.
I think the point is more _what_ we should hoist into the driver. The driver can't currently make very reliable assumptions about what linker is being used.
Optimistically triaging to r23. Here's a patch we can send once we no longer support gold/bfd: ``` From 133de77b4fd8317979616e7a7d46f5a1ff953f9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Albert Date: Thu, 25...
https://reviews.llvm.org/D95492