Ondrej Ille

Hi, thanks for quick answer, I will start looking into the coverage. As for the maintenance, I completely understand the fear of burnout in case of overload, so no pressure...

Hi, thanks for the lower-case names. I am looking into the coverage and I would like to do some extensions. It is going to take some time though (I am...

Thanks, I did not realize that. Btw. I have seen that "simp" pass converts all "VHDL specific" parallel statements to sequential statements. So is it safe to assume that T_IF,...

Hi, I am going through the code, and managed to do at least some basic modifications. I am wondering how to uniquely identify coverable object in the dumped file coverage...

Hi, yes, I meant replacement of the default value `_lineXX`. Section 19.4.2 of 2008 LRM explains it, pretty much naming: `_PX` for processes or anything equivalent to processes, of `_LX`...

Hi @nickg, I am slowly moving forward with the coverage, although I don't have anything really working yet. I decided to split the coverage into 3 categories for now: -...

The syntax is just a proposal, its not exactly like in Modelsim or Xcelium, but its similar. I think Xcelium had something like: ``` exclude -type statement ``` As for...

I am slowly progressing with the code coverage. I managed to add options for separate coverage types, and emit the coverage during "lower" phase. For now, I have statement coverage...

Thanks for explaining, I will give it a try. I noticed lot of JIT stuff moved. My current work is rebased on latest change from yesterday, so for now its...

Thanks for such a quick reply. What existing signal integrity solution would you like to integrate? Sparselizard?