Matthias Becker

> * **Blurry 32x32px PNGs:** Several 32x32px PNGs in Eclipse appear blurry. The following image compares the rasterization result of JSVG with the original 32x32px Icon. > > Did you...

> * **False SVGs:** Four false SVGs were discovered, with explanations in this [issue](https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.images/issues/101) and fixes in this [PR](https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.images/pull/102). So the pass rate of your tests with the Eclipse icons...

Just as a side remark: AFAIK Batik is also used in the images repo's renderer. If we really go for SVG support in Eclipse via one of these libraries we...

> If the images repo will still exist in its current state, I agree. But wouldn't SVG support in Eclipse render the repository obsolete, or at least make the PNG...

> For JSVG this means that 17 SVGs need to be adjusted to be properly rasterized. Which SVGs are these. And do you know that needs to be changed? Maybe...

> > > * **Blurry 32x32px PNGs:** Several 32x32px PNGs in Eclipse appear blurry. The following image compares the rasterization result of JSVG with the original 32x32px Icon. > >...

> > Beside that assigning a milestone to a _closed_ PR is somewhat useless > > There are JDT & platform committers that don't think so, me including. Also looking...

So do it understand it correctly. You want to remove all the contribution files that simply link to https://github.com/eclipse-platform/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md? But would don't plan to delete https://github.com/eclipse-platform/.github/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md itself? My only concern...

> In this case, I would expect that people first look at information in the readme of a repository. And right now, at least in the Platform repository, we have...

> Hi, > > I have opened this PR as draft, because I want to get your opinion on this change. The code can be improved at several places and...