Fred Silberberg
Fred Silberberg
It surprises me that this isn't something we already support. I'm interested in championing this, specifically for `static` local functions only.
> If the breaking change were considered acceptable, would it be ideal to try and stuff this into C# 9 to limit the chance of anyone being broken by this?...
This issue is open for community contribution. To start with, needs an approved specification for how it would work, which can be posted here as a comment or have a...
We're going to be doing some feature triage on Monday. I'm somewhat interested in championing this proposal, as well as a sibling proposal (that hasn't yet been opened as far...
Yep, something like that. I had been thinking about the DIM scenario there, and a ref interface is an interesting way to handle it. I'm not sure how acceptable it...
I'm not as skeptical as Jared here. I'll champion this.
> This is not the conclusion of LDM when we discussed this previously. The previous conclusion of the LDM was that it was possible we'd need to keep this method...
Alright, talked with Jared offline. We were talking past each other about part of my wording above: regardless of whether we implement generalized with support via `$`, that method will...
> I don't think it's entirely correct to say this. It is correct to say this, as long as you include the second part of that sentence: `(though we did...