Fred Silberberg
Fred Silberberg
> For example, i could have a continue; inside a switch inside a foreach. These are all statements. This is inside an expression, which has previously only been break-out-able by...
@orthoxerox thanks, fixed. @svick whether continue will be allowed is still an open question, we need to decide whether we'll allow any control flow out of the expression other than...
No, there are no updates on this.
This was discussed in LDM: https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/meetings/2022/LDM-2022-03-28.md#type-hole-in-static-abstracts While we reject this version of the self constraint, that's not to say we're uninterested in self types in general, we just think it...
Yes, that's an excellent example of the type of thing that needs more thought before we have a `self` or `this` constraint in the language.
Closing this out as the main proposal is #5529.
Failed again: https://ci.dot.net/job/dotnet_roslyn/view/Official%20Builds/job/dev15.5.x/job/windows_debug_unit32/58/.
@marek-safar does it reproduce with the version Manish referenced? The version you mentioned is older.
@CyrusNajmabadi did you still have concerns about the baseline changes here?