stuartmorgan-g

> > I just submitted another common solution. This PR might close if possible. > > Closing in favor of: #3721 There isn't a decision yet that that's the way...

> So would #3721 be prepared to be reviewed and merged please? Please see https://github.com/flutter/plugins/pull/3721#issuecomment-800566453

Adding a setting for this makes sense in the new structure we'll be using, but it's blocked on https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/94051: we'll want to support platform extensions to `WebSettings` instead of adding...

Status update from triage: Still blocked on https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/94051, which is being worked on.

Status update from triage: still blocked, but we hope to be unblocked soon.

Regardless of whether you are using Google's CLA, this package currently lists its license as MIT.

@miquelbeltran Is there a plan to resolve this shortly? The Flutter Favorites program requires a permissive license, so this package is not currently in compliance with the criteria. /cc @slightfoot...

Adding @mhadaily who reviewed the initial PR.

Since `url_launcher` is fully federated, you could in theory depend directly on `url_launcher_linux` and `url_launcher_web` instead of `url_launcher`. You'd have to code against the platform interface directly instead of the...

@chunhtai From triage: ping on this review.