Steven Weerdenburg

@ChrisMaddock I think v4 is a great opportunity to try and get this done. I can't remember if there were any concerns about breaking changes with this, but v4 would...

I see thanks @CharliePoole I wasn't suggesting Chris do it so much as responding to his comment. I'd have the background and interest to take this on myself (and I...

Thanks @lahma The gains in the benchmark look nice, but I share where @Dreamescaper is coming from, at least as it pertains to the .NET Standard build of the framework....

Thanks @lahma for investigating. I agree with you 100% about debugging options for consumers, and I think symbols are also likely a better option. If you don't mind, I'd actually...

Thanks for asking @Phyrik ! This one would likely be a great candidate for work once we decide on an approach. @CharliePoole @mikkelbu for what it's worth, I think I...

Hmm I can appreciate that too @CharliePoole . I'd hoped you'd be able to provide a counter perspective 🙂 Going back to mikkel's original example, with passing null as the...

Or anyone else following this thread, obviously. :) How should the framework handle that case?

Thanks for the detailed investigation @manfred-brands ! If I understand right about a part of your comment, you're saying that the analyzer and the validation by the framework aren't in...

I believe the conversion of null->0 was default behavior in the pre-.NET days of VB when not specifying the optional "strict" compilation option. It wouldn't surprise me if that directly...

Hi @louis-z sorry it's taken a bit to get back to you on your question. You're most welcome to pick this up, but first we may want to confirm a...