Sam Clegg

> Binaryen could separate into tables based on the call_indirect function signature, but it wouldn't add any information. I'm not sure if it would unlock any optimizations. It could remove...

Its not possible to move issues between orgs. You would just open an issue in LLVM and close this one.

Regarding `stop_on_first_error`, I don't think the idea was ever to allow the binary reader to have errors and then continue to on to interpret the module. I think the idea...

> That's valid point. One option could be to remove the bigger optional db, which keeps things simple, but leave the weak symbol definition. So, if application requires specific db,...

Can you attach the file?

Can you reproduce this with DevTools running? There is a typo in _emscripten_receive_om_main_thread_js which make me think you are typing this out by hand, but you should be able to...

It seems like radix is now optional: https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/blob/71785a7e3e04be489510d4695870c7491af17c3f/externs/es6.js#L1942-L1953 I'm not sure when/how it changed though. Maybe this can be closed now?

Unfortunately we don't have anybody how has worked on or contributed to wasm-decompile in a long time. If you would like to improve it that would seems reasonable, or we...

> May I ask why is your decompiler having trouble? I thought WASM should be easier than machine code. Disassembling of Wasm is easy enough, and wasm2wat does that (as...

I believe you have found the correct forum. The JS-API spec is maintained alongside the wasm core spec here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/blob/main/document/js-api/index.bs.