Rachit Nigam

Hi @hackedy! This PR is getting quite stale w.r.t. to `main`. Do we have a specific plan of action on how we want to move this forward? If not, I...

Discussed the possibility of the following rewrites with @priyasrikumar: ``` x = a ? 1 : b ? 2 : c ? 3 : d ? 4 : 0; //...

You can take a shot but the big problem is that the static FSMs don't reset correctly which means you can't compositionally compile the program. This is why our current...

I'm going to make this task blocked on the static timing implementation

Blocked on #1344

@calebmkim did we decide that this doesn't need to be solved or that it isn't obvious what it means in the context of the new static lowering pass?

Right! Maybe we should mark this as a low priority QoR thing to investigate if we have the time?

That's odd! Lowering should still go through the type checker. Can you try using `--log info` or `--log debug` to see what's going wrong? Maybe a type checking pass is...

Thanks for opening this! And yeah, I think you're right that there is something to be addressed there. The silly hack is to of course wrap the `PositAdd` module in...

Yeah, this would be a cool thing to update! Especially w.r.t. `enum` and other new features. Also, @Mark1626, in general, it might be interesting to chat about what your use...