P. L. Lim

cc @nden and @mcara

> Test needed? Yes please, when the behavior is finalized. 😸 Thanks!

That was last refactored by @WilliamJamieson . * https://github.com/astropy/astropy/pull/14012

That is unfortunate. How did this get past integration testing of RC? 🧐

Do I understand correctly that this has been now identified as a downstream bug?

So @olebole , should we open an issue over at aplpy and close this one? Since it is in a different org, I cannot just move this issue. Thanks!

> I feel that 16834 is probably not enough justification in itself to do this I agree. While free-threading is all the rage now (in theory anyway), we should wait...

@daaavo , if you do decide to open PR, please mention that it is for Hacktoberfest so we can slap the appropriate label to get it counted if it looks...

Personally, I think we have enough checks as it is, so my vote is no. Thanks!

Hmm. I don't see why we have to do that. The package has a package-wide license. Maybe @eteq @astrofrog etc would have stronger opinions on this.