Isitha Subasinghe

Yeah i agree with you, would you be interested in contributing this feature?

Copying @agilgur5 's comment [here](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/9529#issuecomment-1980011539) > I've written about my plans to standardize on `expr` in a few other places ([#7576 (comment)](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/7576#issuecomment-1728725234), #12694, [#12693 (comment)](https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/12693#issuecomment-1974873029), etc), figured this issue should...

> This syntax seems overly simplistic -- complex expressions need to be bounded on both edges somehow. Unless you're proposing that all strings become expressions? Yeah I was proposing this,...

/retest

/retest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTIltI0NuNg

@maxsxu Unfortunately I am not sure, I don't think any straight forward alternatives exist though.

Thanks a lot @ryancurrah, glad to know we have an option here at least.

Hmm I still do think @JPZ13 makes a valid point, even if the tooling is better, the question of "do we need protobuf's in the first place" is a fair...

@JPZ13 with regards to feasibility, I think there would be quite a lot of refactoring to be done, more work than to migrate into something like `csproto`. I think it's...