Dave Coleman

@corot I'm working with the PlanningSceneInterface right now and just re-discovered this issue - do you create the new features for that class? I'm interested in getting them merged in.

Something better than http://docs.ros.org/api/urdf/html/? Now that its outside of bloom we'd have to setup our own doxygen generator, right? This is prob obvious, but you can get the same thing...

Thanks for all these very quick thoughts and feedback! Lots of good actionables here, that I agree should be discussed at ROSCon > the fact that the binaries are released...

Makes sense to me. Mostly unrelated: I [wrote a Wikipedia article for URDF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Unified_Robot_Description_Format) recently but it was rejected for not being notable enough. I haven't tried to find better, more...

I did cite my JOSS paper in the original Wikipedia article. However their feedback: > that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject...

+1 adopting Gazebo's conventions

Better link for latest SDFormat sensor model: http://sdformat.org/spec?ver=1.5&elem=sensor

To clarify, option 1 is basically do nothing and leave things the way they are. We are already using tags for using controllers in Gazebo through this method, see [tutorial](http://gazebosim.org/wiki/Tutorials/1.9/ROS_Control_with_Gazebo)...

Looks like we need to change the CI approach to using Docker containers. @dirk-thomas et. al. have a method using bloom we could likely use.

@dirk-thomas would [these](http://wiki.ros.org/buildfarm/Pull%20request%20testing) apply to improving this repo's CI?