Benjamin Rodenberg

If we are breaking, we can also rename it. I like the first option best: ``` ``` I think `provided="true/false"` is a bad choice, because it sounds like if we...

> Assume that the sparse variant is good enough until we run into an example which show-cases performance issues. From a practical point of view we should wait for this...

I changed the milestone of this issue to `v2.x.x` since #163 is part of that milestone and I don't think we can currently prioritize this issue for the next release.

Let's deal with this issue at our Hackathon.

In #382 an appropriate test case is mentioned for the elastictube (see https://github.com/precice/elastictube1d/tree/user-defined-comm). We will have to define similar test cases for the other language bindings, as well. I will...

I wrote a solverdummy for python that uses communicator splitting to test the optional `communicator` argument of `Interface`. See https://github.com/precice/python-bindings/commit/168a70ffd75497d63885d76c012e7b9e906bbeea. Still open question: Do we want to use the customized...

For the matlab bindings, we will not deal with the issue yet. I opened an issue in the matlab bindings repository: https://github.com/precice/matlab-bindings/issues/13

Additionally, if we want to make sure `v202211.1` is future-proof --- respectively even working with Ubuntu 24.04 --- we also could consider backporting #547. This also means that we would...

To some degree this sounds to me similar to [First-participant time stepping](https://github.com/precice/precice/wiki/Adapter's-Time-Step-Sizes#first-participant-time-stepping). But in our current implementation there are some restrictions: * one participant has to take control and the...

Looks like we found culprit in https://github.com/precice/tutorials/pull/563. We will now add the requirement `mpi4py < 4` in the FEniCS adapter. Do you need a bugfix release or is it sufficient...