Zeeshan Ali Khan

@reitermarkus even with my new super powers 🦸‍♂️, it'll still need your approval since you requested changes.

> @reitermarkus even with my new super powers 🦸‍♂️, it'll still need your approval since you requested changes. @sosthene-nitrokey I think @reitermarkus has no time. Since you need to rebase...

Hmm.. actually it turns out that for session bus, the existing brokers do override the values: ```xml 1000000000 250000000 1000000000 250000000 1000000000 120000 240000 150000 100000 10000 100000 10000 50000...

@chawyehsu I've a tiny crate for this, if it helps: https://crates.io/crates/xdg-home

> and **not** supporting `send_interface` or `send_member`: Just to clarify, by "not supporting", I mean we don't restrict based on interface and member etc. IOW, if someone is allowed access...

> I don't know if this is a good idea security wise. It's entirely possible for a service to allow access to an interface, but now allow generalized access to...

> Okay, I noticed an edge case when I was adding more tests > > `` would block all of A if we just ignored the send_member part Hmm.. true....

Based on the answers provided here, I'm closing this.

This is old and I don't even know what it's really about.

I think this PR is ready for a review. I split some of the changes to separate PRs. However, this PR is still based on #6122 and #6102 so those...