Zeeshan Ali Khan

marked this issue as related to #291

I looked into this yesterday a bit and it's not so easy because of the approach we took with #34. The issue is the ownership of the response message when...

marked #106 as a duplicate of this issue

marked this issue as related to #106

In GitLab by @Spider on Nov 24, 2020, 18:27 Thanks!

I think we need to do something like what I [suggested here](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dbus/zbus/-/merge_requests/257#note_809090). An attribute would be required for users to signal to the macro that that's what they want: ```rust...

In GitLab by @danieldg on Sep 29, 2021, 02:39 The second part was mostly done by !391 - though we could perhaps improve that by making those method not return...

> This would allow making `MessageFields` private and have all access to headers be via method on Message that return `Option`s instead of `Result` Not sure this is a good...

In GitLab by @danieldg on Sep 29, 2021, 17:52 You could swap that out for a `message` attribute instead. Or make a wrapper around `Message` (distinct from MessageFields) that only...

I think I'm going to postpone this for zbus 3.0 because: 1. Most important bits of this are already in place, I believe. 1. It's mostly about convenience of the...