ygj6
ygj6
It's an honor to contribute to jquery. Since the PR submission is a little long, I need to spend time sorting out the code.
I'm afraid that it's not supported yet. If we use the ESM format by default, it will depend to the `top-level await` feature, so we have to set the target:'esnext'....
Federation uses a `Top-level await`, which is supported by the following browsers. Change your config `build.target` to `next` or a similar value.  https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/await#browser_compatibility
On the host side, you need to use `vite build` to generate a remoteEntry.js, since `vite dev` is unbundled. Of course you can use `vite build --watch` to keep it...
感谢使用`@originjs/vite-plugin-commonjs`,`vite build`的时候由[`@rollup/plugin-commonjs`](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/src/node/build.ts#L294)处理commonJS代码，所以`@originjs/vite-plugin-commonjs`只能作用于`vite dev`。 你的问题[`transformMixedEsModules`](https://github.com/rollup/plugins/tree/master/packages/commonjs#transformmixedesmodules)选项可以解决，vite配置如下： ```javascript build: { commonjsOptions: { transformMixedEsModules: true, }, } ``` ---------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for using `@originjs/vite-plugin-commonjs`,`vite build` is handled by [`@rollup/plugin-commonjs`](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/src/node/build.ts#L294) for commonJS code, so @originjs/vite-plugin-commonjs can...
vite默认就启用了`@rollup/plugin-commonjs`,不需要配置，`vite build`使用的是`roolup`打包的，也就是说本身roolup的特有插件也只能在`vite build`才会运行 https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/src/node/build.ts#L294 `vite dev`不需要build，只需要预构建，所以我们这个插件只是补充了`vite dev`使用commonJS的述求，所以才只需要在`vite dev`生效即可。
`vite build`默认已经使用了`@rollup/plugin-commonjs`,所以不需要安装和导入，默认就会对纯cjs文件进行处理，而你的例子中是esm和cjs混用，所以需要开启`transformMixedEsModules`.
感谢你的贡献，当前next已经合并了master的修改，这个PR需要你再整理下，把我们没考虑到的再提交下，再次感谢
The MulanPSL-2.0 we use is also a standard SPDX license. You can find it at https://spdx.org/licenses/MulanPSL-2.0.html. It's close to or even looser than the MIT license. Here's a brief difference...
FYI, I made a simple attempt to support SASS modern API #7170