xermicus

> Thanks for reporting and sorry for the late reply! I think we used to get this right, but probably something changed in our writer implementation or in the formatting...

Yes! Async support has unfortunately not yet landed in the zip crate I'd like to use. But this new [PR](https://github.com/zip-rs/zip/pull/204) looks quite promising so I hope to be adding support...

> And we are using Solang to compile Solidity to LLVM IR Please keep in mind that solang is not attempting to be a 1:1 clone of `solc` in regards...

Thinking about this: Why not integrate `subxt` directly into Solang? This would allow us to build a neat CLI user interface (upload, instatiate and RPC call contracts), similar to what...

This ideally just adds functionality to `solang`, possibly implemented in one or more sub-command. I had a quick look at the `subxt` [examples](https://github.com/paritytech/subxt/tree/master/examples/examples) and at first glance this seems easy...

in the discord channel, @extraymond gave us already some useful insight about possible topics to consider, especially about `How to port existing solidity code to Substrate`: > I think the...

I discussed this with @seanyoung today, since implementing this might be more involved than I initially thought. We concluded the following: Complexity stems mostly from having named arguments and having...

WTF thanks DCO

This is getting awkward with the history. I squashed and opened #1035 instead

So as discussed in chat we stick with the requirement to have at least one public message (substrate only). * Contracts without means to interact with have very niche to...