xermicus
xermicus
I am not sure whether this is a good idea. As a Solidity compiler, we should stick to whatever is default in the Solidity language. I fear that by changing...
@seanyoung did #745 fix this?
Ok, I'm not closing this then. Thanks!
This has been fixed a while ago.
The contract compiles and deploys fine with a recent Solang version.
@LucasSte #1225 fixed this?
@Sandeep-Narahari without the full source code of your contracts it's hard to debug this further. However, since there's the `address` type in the function signature, this might be related to...
I'm going to pick this up, [we need it](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/cb4bf950df5ae43356c4935b3900446f6dc20261/contracts/proxy/ERC1967/ERC1967Utils.sol#L67).
@bkushigian yeah good point, it certainly can be implemented in sema but not in later stages. But let's just keep this issue only, implementing it in sema is part of...
@bkushigian FIY I implemented it for sema in #1549