xermicus
xermicus
I implemented a sema check to catch contracts without public messages. How-ever, it would actually be fine for base contracts. ~~Declaring contracts without public messages as non-concrete some-how could solve...
@LucasSte @seanyoung you can review this now. I won't merge until I can depend on some `ink!` v4 beta release, but that shouldn't matter.
I think this is a great effort overall! > when using constructor overloading, due to all constructors have the same name, which contract-transcode will only match the first one, currently...
Hi there! How is this issue related to solang? Are you only unable to get the transaction hash for Contracts compiled with solang, or in general?
> Move all examples into separate repository paritytech/ink_examples and make them point to the production version of ink published on crates.io Just an idea, this could potentially be added as...
I see, this might be a bit more involved then.
I think that ideally we would be able to walk the AST multiple times. It would bring improvements beyond better error handling/messages: - Semantic checks could be split up (e.g....
To get a better estimate on whether the effort would be worth it or, I think we should track any issue that would benefit from a refactor here (like #779)....
Hi @Genysys, are you still on it?
> I understand int[4][2] vec as a matrix of four rows and two columns What? I am 101% with you! > Should vec[1] index the last or the first dimension?...