Webber Takken

Hi @jcs090218, thank you for your message. Short term I think we're open to moving these actions to GameCI. Mid-to-long term I believe the best way forward is to integrate...

Ok, sounds good. If it's ok for you, please transfer the repos, then we'll provide you with maintainer status on those repos.

When you say "this feature", you mean the activation or moving to shared kernel in a separate repository (which hasn't been done so far)? We haven't come to a definite...

Great! You have been invited as a member with read permissions. Once you transfer the repositories to `game-ci` we'll give you write permissions to them.

I have experienced this same bug, so I can confirm it's happening as well. As I'm not very experienced with Unity I wasn't able to make such a detailed write-up....

Since both seem to be differences between host-platforms, or otherwise difference between GameCI and local builds I feel we might keep one issue until it starts clouding the issues at...

@KoenRijpstra that is great! Thank you for sharing your solution with us. I believe a logical next step for us would be to try and see if we're able to...

I agree with your sentiment. We're also not in the habit of making any magic fixes. The way I understand the issue is that it works as normal in a...

The thing is that in CI these files aren't automatically generated afaik. Adding another parameter to our public api doesn't feel quite right either, because builds should "just work" (if...

In case we make another module I think the best way forward would be to have a monorepo. Initially GitHub Actions did not support monorepos because actions needed to be...