Bill Duncan
Bill Duncan
Personally, I prefer that we require upper case moving forward. I creates less hassle (IMHO).
@dr-shorthair I think by 'application ontology' @cmungall means that all the terms imported from other OBO ontologies (i.e., it doesn't have any terms of its own). Doing this, would mean...
I have question: Why is not marking the term as `owl:deprecated true` adequate? Is this going to be required as well as prepending with 'obsolete'?
So are we going to require both the deprecated flag and prepending 'obsolete'?
For the record ... I'm not *necessarily* opposed to adding the labels. I just think that the use of `owl:deprecated` is important b/c of how it shows up in Protege...
How formal do we want to be about defining `anaerobe` as an organism? The definitions is straight forward (to me at least): ``` an organism that does not require oxygen...
The problem (I think) is that in these cases is that the semantics of `part of` isn't clear. Saying that a mobile clinic is an ABP is like that dandruff...
Thanks @pbuttigieg
I agree that they are best represented as a child of `ICE`. Perhaps we might want to shortcut relation between the simulation code (as an ICE) and the things results...
I would be okay with it as a sub class of `plan specification`, except the definition has language about plan specifications being concretized as a realizable entity. I wrote a...