Prithvi Raj

>I am not sure why we need phase 1-2 approach and restrictions. We don't really, if we agree on the merge rules, it may be simpler to implement the rules...

I think this is a good idea. Internally, we've run into a problem where services were setting timestamps far enough in the future to cause overflows. >Drop spans outside of...

@wu-sheng Indeed, it was @yurishkuro who suggested discussing this here! I agree with @wu-sheng and @pavolloffay in that the service owner is the best judge of what sensitive information. As...

>The proposed approach is to configure client libraries to emit all spans over UDP to the local jaeger-agent running on the host, irrespective of any sampling. I propose some refinements....

@JasonChen86899 @jpkrohling - unfortunately no new development has been happening on Jaeger at Uber since late March. We were able to get a proof of concept running before then which...

Relates to https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/issues/139

Thanks for the heads up! Agree with this direction (also, goodbye 64KB UDP packet size limitation)

>Why do we recommend that instead of just running on host network? I suggested this when writing the initial document because the end user experience of docker host networking differs...

@marqc Thanks for the suggestion - we haven't yet explored it because we weren't familiar with how the build and deployment process changes when depending on a native bindings.