Vladik Romanovsky

> We run the kubevirt stack at large scale and we dont use node labels discovered by node-labeller. For that reason, we are exploring disabling the node labeller via a...

Nothing to add. Looks like a really good PR! /approve

@dasionov what about the [memory overhead](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/blob/main/pkg/virt-controller/services/renderresources.go#L373) from each device? Doesn't it vary, or is it all within this amount?

> > @dasionov what about the [memory overhead](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/blob/main/pkg/virt-controller/services/renderresources.go#L373) from each device? Doesn't it vary, or is it all within this amount? > > Hi @vladikr, > > I ran some...

/cc @lyarwood

> > > I had started drafting an enhancement a few weeks ago to allow this [1] but got distracted by other work and never got around to posting it....

@iholder101 we should get acks from other sigs to proceed. does it make sense?

Thanks @iholder101 ! Looks like there are no objections from any of the sigs, for I'll approve /approve

@lyarwood @dhiller @jean-edouard @aburdenthehand

I verified this manually: ```Referenced KubeVirt Enhancement issue(s) in PR kubevirt/kubevirt/pulls/14705: {24} Fetching items from project 'kubevirt/projects/15' to check for 'Status: Tracked' Match: KubeVirt Enhancement issue #24 (referenced in this...